If a token's price is connected to an ecosystem that includes interest-based products but the token itself does not directly generate interest, is holding it prohibited?
Question context
CoinStudy's answer
Research opinion from the CoinStudy Sharia team. Not a fatwa.
CoinStudy applies the AAOIFI economic dependence test to exchange tokens and ecosystem tokens. The compliance question is whether the token's value depends economically on the growth of prohibited financial activity. BNB's value grows when Binance's earn programs attract more deposits and when leveraged trading volume increases. This economic dependence creates a compliance concern even without formal ownership or a contractual claim on the revenue. Scholars who apply only the strict AAOIFI ownership test would reach different conclusions. CoinStudy applies the economic dependence framework which our chairman has validated through his BNB ruling. This is an area of genuine scholarly discussion.
Related questions
- Pakistan's Grand Mufti ruled all cryptocurrency is haram. Does that mean I should stop all my crypto investments?
- Is converting QELT to QXMP stablecoin without yield or QSRT participation permissible under the Chairman's framework?
- ShariaQuant raised three concerns about Ducat Protocol UNIT certification. Were these concerns valid and how did CoinStudy respond?
- Is Bitcoin Cash BCH halal? It is a fork of Bitcoin which scholars declared halal. Does the same ruling apply?
- I bought Fartcoin at $1.50 and it is now $0.13. Should I sell now or wait? What does Islam say about losses from haram investments?